Thesis and Dissertation Writing Services in Africa

Thesis Africa main

AI Detector Challenge – vs 

The AI detector challenge serves as a means to evaluate how different artificial intelligence tools discern between AI-generated and human-written text. Within this framework, we delve into the specifics of each tool, namely and, and analyze their respective methods of detecting AI-generated or human-written text. Additionally, we assess the pros and cons associated with each tool.

AI Detector Challenge vs vs

In detecting the source of writing, students, copywriters, and teachers use ZeroGPT to identify if a text was generated by AI tools such as ChatGPT or Google Bard or is human-written. It allows a user to enter a text into a box; the user then selects “Detect Text” to begin the process. It begins by running several intricate and in-depth algorithms against your text.

Next, it will present the result to you as follows: – Your is human written – Your text is AI/GPT generated – Most of your text is AI/GPT generated – Your text is most likely AI/GPT – Your text contains mixed signals with some parts generated by AI/GPT – Your text is likely Human written, may contain parts generated by AI/GPT.
After the result is displayed, it gives the percentage of the AI/GPT plagiarized text in a gauge.

Recommended: Academic Writing Structure; The Importance of Structuring Your Academic Writing for Maximum Impact

Diversity and Inclusion in Academic Research; Promoting Equitable Representation and Voices

Technology Role in Research; 4 things you should know while adopting technological tools in Academic Research Writing


1. Accurate detection of up to 98%
2. Easy to use, user-friendly and straightforward.
3. It protects user privacy and treats it as a top concern.
4. It supports multiple languages.


1. It does not proofread, nor does it edit.
2. It generates false positives or false negatives.

This AI tool ensures a 98% accuracy rate and provides privacy and data security. It also differentiates between human and AI-generated text using enough algorithms and supports multiple languages. Regarding broad model compatibility, it can detect output from different AI models such as GPT -4, GPT -3, GPT -2, LLaMA, Google Bard, and other AI services.


1. Fast results are produced at an instance giving the percentage of human-written and AI-generated text
2. It ensures privacy by not storing the user’s text.
3. It supports multiple languages
4. It uses an advanced algorithm.
5. It is ideal for various users, including students, professional writers, freelancers etc.


1. It is restricted to just 1000 words at a time

Similarities And Differences Between and


1. Both and supports multiple languages
2. They both ensure user privacy and treat as a top concern.
3. They both display results in the form of coloured highlighted texts.
4. They both have a box where text can be entered and a “Detect” button for checking the outcome of a text

5. They both show if it is AI-generated or human-written.
6. They both use a percentage for text detection.
7. They both display the result in the same method.

Also Read: Diversity and Inclusion in Academic Research; Promoting Equitable Representation and Voices

There are no limits to texts that can be entered at a time Unlike, has a text limit of 1000 words at a time.
Uses percentage to display AI/GPT plagiarized text uses percentages to weigh the outcome of the text, if it is AI-generated or Human written.
It uses a percentage gauge to indicate plagiarized words It indicates plagiarized words using an orange-coloured highlighted text
It gives a direct display of the result or outcome It first predicts the text entered before displaying the outcome
It permits upload from an external source. It does not permit file upload from external sources.
It does not have a clear text button It supports a clear text button.


After carrying out the research about the various AI tools ( and and having compared them both in terms of similarities and differences, it was observed both share common similarities, but is highly recommended when trying to find out if a text is Human written or AI-generated, because it has no text limit.

Therefore a user can input as many words as possible at a time, unlike the, which is limited to 1000 words. Also, the tool displays a direct result of a text entered, unlike, which predicts an outcome before displaying it.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies and asks your personal data to enhance your browsing experience. We are committed to protecting your privacy and ensuring your data is handled in compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).