AI Detector Challenge – ZeroGPT.com vs ZeroGPT.cc 

ZeroGPT.com vs ZeroGPT.cc 

ZeroGPT.com:

In detecting the source of writing, students, copywriters, and teachers use ZeroGPT to identify if a text was generated by AI tools such as ChatGPT or Google Bard or is human-written. It allows a user to enter a text into a box; the user then selects “Detect Text” to begin the process. It begins by running several intricate and in-depth algorithms against your text.

Next, it will present the result to you as follows: – Your is human written – Your text is AI/GPT generated – Most of your text is AI/GPT generated – Your text is most likely AI/GPT – Your text contains mixed signals with some parts generated by AI/GPT – Your text is likely Human written, may contain parts generated by AI/GPT.
After the result is displayed, it gives the percentage of the AI/GPT plagiarized text in a gauge.

Recommended: Academic Writing Structure; The Importance of Structuring Your Academic Writing for Maximum Impact

Diversity and Inclusion in Academic Research; Promoting Equitable Representation and Voices

Technology Role in Research; 4 things you should know while adopting technological tools in Academic Research Writing

PROS:

1. Accurate detection of up to 98%
2. Easy to use, user-friendly and straightforward.
3. It protects user privacy and treats it as a top concern.
4. It supports multiple languages.

CONS:

1. It does not proofread, nor does it edit.
2. It generates false positives or false negatives.

ZeroGPT.cc:

This AI tool ensures a 98% accuracy rate and provides privacy and data security. It also differentiates between human and AI-generated text using enough algorithms and supports multiple languages. Regarding broad model compatibility, it can detect output from different AI models such as GPT -4, GPT -3, GPT -2, LLaMA, Google Bard, and other AI services.

PROS:

1. Fast results are produced at an instance giving the percentage of human-written and AI-generated text
2. It ensures privacy by not storing the user’s text.
3. It supports multiple languages
4. It uses an advanced algorithm.
5. It is ideal for various users, including students, professional writers, freelancers etc.

CONS:

1. It is restricted to just 1000 words at a time

Similarities And Differences Between ZeroGPT.com and ZeroGPT.cc

Similarities:

1. Both ZeroGPT.com and ZeroGPT.cc supports multiple languages
2. They both ensure user privacy and treat as a top concern.
3. They both display results in the form of coloured highlighted texts.
4. They both have a box where text can be entered and a “Detect” button for checking the outcome of a text

5. They both show if it is AI-generated or human-written.
6. They both use a percentage for text detection.
7. They both display the result in the same method.

Also Read: Diversity and Inclusion in Academic Research; Promoting Equitable Representation and Voices

Differences:

Conclusion:

After carrying out the research about the various AI tools (ZeroGPT.com and ZeroGPT.cc) and having compared them both in terms of similarities and differences, it was observed both share common similarities, but ZeroGPT.com is highly recommended when trying to find out if a text is Human written or AI-generated, because it has no text limit.

Therefore a user can input as many words as possible at a time, unlike the ZeroGPT.cc, which is limited to 1000 words. Also, the ZeroGPT.com tool displays a direct result of a text entered, unlike ZeroGPT.cc, which predicts an outcome before displaying it.